(The contents of this page are provided by the Finance and Economics Experimental Laboratory at the University of Exeter.)
Stand-alone demonstration - Try out this single-player experiment.
Example subject instructions - View subject instructions.
Students play individually in the role of a supplier, whose objective is to extract as much profit as possible from two buyers played by the computer, when various forms of price discrimination are allowed. The buyers' valuations are different and the supplier knows the value to each buyer of 1 item and of 2 items, i.e. there are four valuations in all. Students play four consecutive games where different degrees of price discrimination are allowed: no discrimination, partial discrimination based on buyer (3rd degree), partial discrimination on quantity (2nd degree) and full discrimination on both buyer and quantity (1st degree). Playing multiple rounds of each game allows students to experiment with different prices and understand how the buyers behave.
Intended Learning Outcomes
Discussion of Likely Results
Each item costs £5 to produce and the buyers' valuations are as follows.
Buyers prefer to buy 2 items rather than 1 if indifferent in terms of their valuations.
With no discrimination, charge £20 per item and sell 1 to A and 1 to B, profit £30.
With buyer discrimination, charge A £20 per item and B £30 per item and sell 1 to A and 1 to B, profit £40.
With quantity discrimination, charge £20 for 1 item and £30 for 2 items and sell 1 to A and 2 to B, profit £35. (B has the same surplus of £10 for both 1 item and 2 items and therefore buys the larger quantity.) It is easy for the students to think that the prices should be £20 for 1 item and £40 for 2 items. The key for them to understand this is that then buyer B will buyer only 1 item and get a surplus of £10 rather than a surplus of 0 for buying 2 items.
With full discrimination, charge A £20 for 1 item and B £40 for 2 items and sell 1 to A and 2 to B, profit £45. 3. One could mention that while full discrimination is worst for the consumer, it is the most efficient (highest buyer+seller surplus).